EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Channel Access not connecting
From: Bruce Hill <[email protected]>
To: Mark Rivers <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:09:29 -0700
Thanks all for the suggestions!
I was giving a tour this morning, so I'm just getting back to this problem.

I did have 3 soft IOC's running on that host, along with
caRepeater.    Our common pattern is to use a host script to use procServ
to launch caRepeater and each soft IOC.     However, I just tried
killing all of them and running just one soft IOC, both with and without
caRepeater being run explicitly.   When I don't run caRepeater, it gets
started automatically as a child of my soft IOC after caget tries to connect,
so that much at least seems to be working right.

Unfortunately, I still get:
% caget SXR:RCI:MMS:05
Channel connect timed out: 'SXR:RCI:MMS:05' not found.

I was hoping that just running one soft IOC was the key to the casr output:
UDP Server:
UDP 0.0.0.0:0(): User="", V4.0, 0 Channels, Priority=0
but that didn't change.

- Bruce

On 05/17/2011 07:38 AM, Mark Rivers wrote:
I'm a bit confused here.

I run multiple IOCs on my Linux server all the time, without doing
anything special with the ports.  I do see this message after iocInit()
when starting IOCs after the first one:

**********************************
cas warning: Configured TCP port was unavailable.
cas warning: Using dynamically assigned TCP port 58629,
cas warning: but now two or more servers share the same UDP port.
cas warning: Depending on your IP kernel this server may not be
cas warning: reachable with UDP unicast (a host's IP in
EPICS_CA_ADDR_LIST)
**********************************

However, channel access clients have no trouble connecting to PVs in any
of those IOCs.

This is Fedora Core 9.

Do more recent Linux kernels have a problem with this?

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Claude Saunders
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Channel Access not connecting

Hi Bruce,

 From your first sentence, I see "IOC's" (plural) and "linux". I 
recently had what I believe is the same problem, which Andrew Johnson 
kindly helped me understand. If you are running two iocs on one linux 
host, using default ports, you wind up with two processes listening on 
the same udp port. I gather with linux, the network stack will only 
deliver an incoming (pv search) broadcast UDP packet to one of those 
processes. If it happens to be the one without the PV you're looking 
for, then the ca_search fails, even though the other IOC process 
contains the PV.

    - Claude

On 05/17/2011 12:12 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
  
I've been having trouble with one linux machine where my IOC's appear
to be running correctly, dbgf works from iocsh, but caget from another
window on the same machine fails to connect.     I suspect it has 
something
to do with how the multiple interfaces on this machine are configured,
    
  
but
so far have been unable to find a solution.

# ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:68:79:5C:4E          inet 
addr:134.79.32.161  Bcast:134.79.35.255  Mask:255.255.252.0
         inet6 addr: fe80::21e:68ff:fe79:5c4e/64 Scope:Link
         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
         RX packets:190759 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
         TX packets:43567 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
         RX bytes:18427912 (17.5 MiB)  TX bytes:9772031 (9.3 MiB)
         Interrupt:19

eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:68:79:5C:50          inet 
addr:192.168.254.2  Bcast:192.168.254.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
         inet6 addr: fe80::21e:68ff:fe79:5c50/64 Scope:Link
         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
         RX packets:1238443 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
         TX packets:879202 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
         RX bytes:80539799 (76.8 MiB)  TX bytes:64420869 (61.4 MiB)
         Interrupt:20 Base address:0x4000

Gateway is 134.79.35.1

I'm running with defaults for the EPICS_CA* and EPICS_CAS* env
    
variables,
  
but have also played with EPICS_CA_ADDR_LIST, EPICS_CA_AUTO_ADDR_LIST,
and EPICS_CA_INTF_ADDR_LIST with no success.

See attached files for casr, epicsEnvShow, ifconfig, and netstat
    
output
  
for more configuration details.     We're running base 3.14.9 
everywhere, but this
is the only machine showing this problem.

The casr output includes:
UDP Server:
UDP 0.0.0.0:0(): User="", V4.0, 0 Channels, Priority=0

This looks wrong to me, as my working IOC's show a valid UDP addr, but
    
  
I'm
not sure how to fix this, or even if this is the root problem.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
- Bruce

P.S.  When I run caget, tcpdump shows:
# /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth0  -n -nn udp dst portrange 5064-5065
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol 
decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
21:46:55.934345 IP 192.168.254.2.54260 > 134.79.35.255.5065: UDP, 
length 16
21:46:57.179960 IP 134.79.32.161.43268 > 134.79.35.255.5064: UDP, 
length 48
21:46:57.211939 IP 134.79.32.161.43268 > 134.79.35.255.5064: UDP, 
length 48
21:46:57.275932 IP 134.79.32.161.43268 > 134.79.35.255.5064: UDP, 
length 48
21:46:57.403935 IP 134.79.32.161.43268 > 134.79.35.255.5064: UDP, 
length 48

    

  

-- 
Bruce Hill
Member Technical Staff
SLAC National Accelerator Lab
2575 Sand Hill Road M/S 10
Menlo Park, CA  94025

References:
Channel Access not connecting Bruce Hill
Re: Channel Access not connecting Claude Saunders
RE: Channel Access not connecting Mark Rivers

Navigate by Date:
Prev: alh1_2_24 build problem Noel Giffin
Next: Re: Handling failures in st.cmd Andrew Johnson
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Channel Access not connecting Bruce Hill
Next: RE: Channel Access not connecting Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 18 Nov 2013 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·