Subject: |
RE: Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 |
From: |
"Jeff Hill" <[email protected]> |
To: |
<[email protected]> |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:27:26 -0700 |
Yes, there were two new features merged into CA for the R3.14.12 patch
release. I will have a look.
PS: IMHO, we can consider that risk is reduced if only patches are merged
into patch releases. Perhaps new features are best placed in point releases.
Jeff
______________________________________________________
Jeffrey O. Hill Email [email protected]
LANL MS H820 Voice 505 665 1831
Los Alamos NM 87545 USA FAX 505 665 5107
Message content: TSPA
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is
not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they
are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them
as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:tech-talk-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Johnson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 2:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS
> 3.14.12
>
> On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:21:32 Till Straumann wrote:
> > Could be a limitation of the CA protocol
>
> No, this is as a result of changes in src/rsrv between 3.14.11 and
> 3.14.12
> because large arrays work fine in 3.14.11.
>
> We introduced two major new features in the latest release, CA over TCP
> and
> dynamic array sizing, and one of them (most probably the latter) has
> broken
> the correct reporting of the element count. The CA protocol solved the
> problem of only a having a 16 bit m_count field a long time ago, but it
> looks
> like that hack^H^H^H^Hsolution didn't get propagated into the latest
> code.
>
> - Andrew
> --
> If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
> scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
> refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
> which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
> will accept it even on the slightest evidence. -- Bertrand Russell
- References:
- Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 Mark Rivers
- Re: Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 Till Straumann
- Re: Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Building seq-2.0.11 with base-3.14.12 Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: gateway question Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Problem using large arrays with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: large arrays native element count wrong with Channel Access in EPICS 3.14.12 Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|