Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Hi Andrew

On Montag, 15. November 2010, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2010 11:25:47 Ben Franksen wrote:
> > If you are using the pv layer for anything (other than as
> > obligatory bridge to CA as required by previous sequencer
> > versions), or if you think that there are other important reasons
> > to keep it, this is your last chance to save it, otherwise it's
> > going to pay its debt to nature.
>
> Fine by me.

Good.

> While you're making sequencer changes, could you replace all
> instances of OFFSET(s,m) (from dbDefs.h) with the standard macro
> offsetof(s,m) in the sequencer code; I'd like to retire that macro in
> the 3.15 releases since it really is a direct replacement and I think
> the sequencer is its last major user.

The sequencer defines its own version (in seqCom.h) if it is not already 
defined; anyway I already removed it in my working version, so consider 
it done ;-)

Cheers
Ben

References:

Attention, poll: Who needs the sequencer's pv layer? Ben Franksen

Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen

Re: Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: asyn driver on Windows XP Eric Norum

Next: Stand-alone sequencer programs Ben Franksen

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <2010>  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Andrew Johnson

Next: Re: Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <2010>  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024