Hi Ben,
On Sunday 14 November 2010 11:25:47 Ben Franksen wrote:
>
> If you are using the pv layer for anything (other than as obligatory
> bridge to CA as required by previous sequencer versions), or if you
> think that there are other important reasons to keep it, this is your
> last chance to save it, otherwise it's going to pay its debt to nature.
Fine by me.
While you're making sequencer changes, could you replace all instances of
OFFSET(s,m) (from dbDefs.h) with the standard macro offsetof(s,m) in the
sequencer code; I'd like to retire that macro in the 3.15 releases since it
really is a direct replacement and I think the sequencer is its last major
user.
Thanks,
- Andrew
--
If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. -- Bertrand Russell
- Replies:
- Re: Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen
- References:
- Attention, poll: Who needs the sequencer's pv layer? Ben Franksen
- Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
about the cPCI/EPICS system of APS/LBNL 王林
- Next:
Re: EPICS base on Windows with INSTALL_LOCATION on a different drive Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen
- Next:
Re: Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer Ben Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|