On Monday 06 October 2008 09:18:39 David Dudley wrote:
> The calcout method sounds like what I'm going to use for this function.
> I was just wondering if there was another way (or a simpler one) to do
> the same thing.
There might be, especially if you want to have an EDM button pointing to the
bo record to provide an ENUM interface to the value â with calcout that would
need 3 records rather than 2.
> From my point of view, I want to only have the record process when the
> value changes, either from 0-1, or from 1-0.
The other mechanism built into the IOC that has "process on change" semantics
is a CA link marked CP. The bo record that actually connects to the PLC has
OMSL="closed_loop" and its DOL field is a CP or CPP link to a "shadow" bo
record in the same IOC which holds the new value to be output. Only when the
shadow record's value change does the CP link cause the output record to be
processed.
The only tricky thing here might be at start-up, where you could need to use
the SDIS & DISV fields of the final record to prevent the thing from
processing when you reboot the IOC and the first value arrives.
HTH,
- Andrew
--
Talk is cheap. Show me the code. -- Linus Torvalds
- References:
- Process 'bo' on write? David Dudley
- Re: Process 'bo' on write? Tim Mooney
- Re: Process 'bo' on write? David Dudley
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Process 'bo' on write? Maren Purves
- Next:
IOC debug with Workbench haquin
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Process 'bo' on write? David Dudley
- Next:
Re: Process 'bo' on write? Dirk Zimoch
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|