I've been reading the IP support mail messages over the last couple of
hours on tech-talk and I guess I have a question about all of it and a
few comments. I've read through all of your stuff, so I might as well
throw my stuff out here too.
I see three basic IP developments in process, maybe four:
1) telescope community (Andrew/Peregrine)
2) IRM developments and other (Matthias/DESY/Fermilab)
3) HiDEOS
My main question is this: What is the main reason that you (supporters and
users of 1 and 2) have dismissed HiDEOS? Much (not all) of the development
in 1 and 2 has been done after the HiDEOS development. I'm really not trying
to sell HiDEOS or anything, I just want feedback.
I think it would be nice if we could have a unified IP support package
so that everyone using IP could easily configure there system. Look
what happens now and probably even worse in the future. I want to
run Profibus, GPIB, and relays, I need to get the support for
all three of the above packages. Each of these has a different
configuration mechanism. This seems like a real hassle.
I beleive one person told me that C++ was the reason for not considering
HIDEOS. It seems that the future direction of vxWorks (Tornado), and
in my opinion EPICS, is C++. Look at CDEV and the portable CA server. I
beleive that these packages would be more difficult to understand, use,
and maintain without C++.
I really wish we could discuss merging all the developments into one
package, so that everyone could benefit when a new IP module driver is
written. It is my opinion that drivers for many of the IP modules are
not easy to write correctly.
Bill Brown:
> There was some talk at the CERN meeting about support for IP packs under
> _EPICS_ (as opposed to under HIDEOS).
I don't understand this. Everything under HIDEOS runs under EPICS.
Basically HiDEOS is the drv support and there is dev support for the
particular modules.
Jim
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS vs. IP packs watson
- Next:
Re: IP support watson
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS vs. IP packs Matthias Clausen DESY -MKS-2/KRYK-
- Next:
Re: IP support watson
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|