On 04/03/2015 11:12 AM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
>> To be honest I'm slightly surprised that we haven't already done that.
>> I'd be in favour of the change Ralph is suggesting using the size, and I
>> would even suggest considering allowing the user to adjust how large the
>> log buffer is at initialization time. This would allow users to turn on
>> DB_EVENT_LOG_STRINGS (which nobody else really knows about anyway)
>> without recompiling.
>
> Selecting the size at runtime might mean a more invasive change to
> db_field_log.
True, but I'm encouraging Ralph to look at that further possibility as
well; we don't know for sure how much more complex it might be until
someone actually codes it (it might be as simple as adding an integer
variable and 2 additions).
>> A 3.15 change IMHO, as is Matej's pCAS update.
>
> To me, depends on final complexity.
Agreed, I'm just suggesting that development be done on the 3.15 branch
as it's easier to merge a feature branch into a later release branch
than it is into an earlier one.
- Andrew
--
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong.
No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has
always got there first, and is waiting for it.
-- Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
- Replies:
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Ralph Lange
- References:
- Small arrays in rsrv Ralph Lange
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Andrew Johnson
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
APS Jenkins Upgrade Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Next:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|