On 04/03/2015 12:12 PM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
> On 04/03/2015 11:44 AM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
>> On 04/03/2015 09:50 AM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I support an alternative would be a memory pool for small arrays (<128
>>> bytes?).
>>
>> I'm guessing that adding a memory pool would need more invasive work,
>> whereas just using the storage already available in the db_field_log
>> objects for array data would need no additional memory allocations.
>
> I agree with you. "support" was meant to be "suppose" :) Just wanted
> it to be considered.
Then again having one, tested, implementation might let us chase out
things like dbContextReadNotifyCacheAllocator.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epics-base/+bug/1440186
- Replies:
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Andrew Johnson
- References:
- Small arrays in rsrv Ralph Lange
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Andrew Johnson
- Re: Small arrays in rsrv Michael Davidsaver
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Andrew Johnson
- Next:
include valgrind.h in Base? Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: Small arrays in rsrv Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|