Florian Feldbauer <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Do you have an idea how to implement this addressing scheme using only
> _one_ asynPortDriver? The hole device support should to be easy to
> configure...
>
Is this because you need to have only one TCP/IP connection (SOAP?) to
some RPC-server (ISEG iCS?). You could have one port per ISEG module if
you share some connection object with asynPortDriver instances, and use
the address to indicate the channel for the operation.
I think the addressing would be quite clear in this case, since each
port could be configured to know the (crate, node, module) part.
Jani Hakala
- References:
- Question about device support Florian Feldbauer
- RE: Question about device support Mark Rivers
- Re: Question about device support Florian Feldbauer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Question about device support Mark Rivers
- Next:
Draft requirements document for enhanced EPICS motor support Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Question about device support Michael Davidsaver
- Next:
EPICS Base 3.15.2 released Ralph Lange
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·