Subject: |
Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority |
From: |
Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: |
EPICS Tech-Talk <[email protected]> |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:57:55 +0100 |
On 28.11.2012 17:38, Andrew Johnson wrote:
>> Of course, that was my first thought, too. However, what happens if
>> this caRepeater for some reason dies - wouldn't the RT-IOC try to
>> spawn a new one (now running under SCHED_FIFO)? This could lead
>> to ugly spurious real-time violations.
> True, unless we had some kind of wrapper that would restart the caRepeater.
We have one.
procServ can run almost anything as child process: IOCs, caRepeaters, CA
Gateways, ParseCASW (the annotated beacon anomaly checker).....
It (among many other things) offers auto-restart.
~Ralph
- References:
- posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Till Straumann
- Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Andrew Johnson
- Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Till Straumann
- Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Agilent N1912A Szalata, Zenon M.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: posix osiSpawnDetachedProcess inherits scheduling policy + priority Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Data acquisition for ICP accelerometers Matt Rippa
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|