On 2/28/12 10:07 PM, Elder Matias wrote:
> Wow, this is a hot topic.
>
> I am going to stay out of the argument on what makes the best display manager, each lab/project needs to make that decision for themselves. I will provide some insight into what we are doing at CLS......
It's a hot topic for those interested in QT-based tools. (I'm
not saying I'm against them.) Andrew did not ask for a
discussion of what would be the best MEDM, EDM, etc.
replacement, but rather asked for an expression of interest in a
collaboration to develop QT-based tools. I'm just wanting to
make it clear that probably a number of people (including me)
are refraining from expressing opinions on what should be the
replacement for MEDM and friends since that's not what Andrew
asked. Andrew has decided on QT-based tools and is asking for
an expression of interest in a collaboration on that.
Lewis
- Replies:
- RE: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Elder Matias
- References:
- Re: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Claude Saunders
- RE: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Elder Matias
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Operator display description, to get off QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Dalesio, Leo
- Next:
RE: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Elder Matias
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Elder Matias
- Next:
RE: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested Elder Matias
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|