Hi Till,
Originally, there were only A-J input fields in the genSub
and the idea was that you would set-up all the input fields
with values and then make the record process by writing to
what was then then the last field. I didn't want to make
it process before I had set-up all the fields.
Cheers,
Andy
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Till Straumann wrote:
> I saw that - in contrast to good old subRecord - the
> various input fields (A..U) of aSub or genSub
> do not have the pp(TRUE) attribute, i.e., when I
> change one of these inputs the record is not processed
> (if passive).
>
> As a curiosity, the genSub record had just input
> field J with pp(TRUE).
>
> Can someone enlighten me why these records were
> designed this way? It would seem more useful to me
> that when I write to an input field the record
> should process.
>
> - Till
>
- References:
- gensub/asub inputs not PP Till Straumann
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
CSS BOY Meter widget limits Paweł Prędki
- Next:
Re: CSS BOY Meter widget limits Kasemir, Kay
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
gensub/asub inputs not PP Till Straumann
- Next:
bo Record not forcing VAL to 0 or 1 Bruce Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|