> We are wondering here, how to host multiple soft
> IOCs on the same computer, possibly
> sharing the same UDP CA request port.
It is a simple matter to add multicast support to the
ca server, and that will address this issue.
Jeff
______________________________________________________
Jeffrey O. Hill Email [email protected]
LANL MS H820 Voice 505 665 1831
Los Alamos NM 87545 USA FAX 505 665 5107
Message content: TSPA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:tech-talk-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Anze Zagar
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:02 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Actually the issue is not on client side. CArepeater is used for client
> applications to share the beacon UDP port (e.g. EDM screens and also
> IOCs because they can be clients to one another...). We are wondering
> here, how to host multiple soft IOCs on the same computer, possibly
> sharing the same UDP CA request port. For broadcast UDP packets this is
> not really an issue, because Linux UDP stack is implemented in such a
> way that it by default fans out the packet to all services running on
> that particular port. Though, I'm not convinced that this is really
> standard UDP stack behavior and that we have any guaranties it will
> still work with future versions of Linux kernel. The second problem is
> that at some stage ITER may also want to configure some client to send
> unicast requests. Then it will for certain not work on Linux because in
> that case only one IOC will in fact receive the request.
>
> I see a few possibilities here:
> o) Ignore the problem and assume that in ITER broadcast UDP will always
> be used and there will be no problems in future. This is also ok if we
> assume that at some stage they will switch to EPICS v4 where port
> sharing will no longer be an issue.
> o) Do something with modular epics and have only one IOC application
> running, hosting all the required IOCs as modules.
> o) Assign different ports to different IOCs. This will very likely
> course cause a lot of other manageability issues.
>
> Cheers,
> Anze Zagar.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 11:22 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> > Here at ITER, t
> > Hi Pam,
> >
> > We use the CArepeater UDP server on our linux hosts.
> >
> > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/unix/package/rtems/epics-
> 3.14.6/base/html/CAref.html#Repeater
> >
> > Is that what you need?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Matthew
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pam Gurd
> > Sent: 24 September 2010 09:18
> > To: EPICS tech-talk
> > Subject: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers
> >
> >
> >
> > hey're asking me about how to manage the problem of ensuring
> > that each of the soft IOCs running on a host has a distinct
> > port number.
> >
> >
> >
> > What have people done to solve this problem?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Pam.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright
> > and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended
> > addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an
> authorised
> > recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning
> > the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the
> > information in or attached to the e-mail.
> > Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual
> > and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> > Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
> > attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for
> > any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses
> which
> > may be transmitted in or with the message.
> > Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in
> > England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House,
> Harwell
> > Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United
> > Kingdom
> >
> >
> >
- Replies:
- Re: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Matthieu Bec
- References:
- Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Pam Gurd
- RE: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers matthew.pearson
- RE: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Anze Zagar
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Anze Zagar
- Next:
SNS CSS Update, BOY Image Viewer, CSS on 64 bit Kasemir, Kay
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Anze Zagar
- Next:
Re: Soft IOCs and Port Numbers Matthieu Bec
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|