EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  <20012002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  <20012002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: RAWF, RAWL
From: Marty Kraimer <[email protected]>
To: Benjamin Franksen <[email protected]>
Cc: EPICS tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:05:52 -0500
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> 
> Marty Kraimer wrote:
> >
> > "Redman, Russell O." wrote:
> >
> > > Marty, is it worth the bother to back out of the changes you made to add
> > > RAWL and RAWF?  Or are there enough special cases, and sufficient utility in
> > > simulation records to justify retaining RAWL and RAWF?
> >
> > I would rather back out the changes. They have not appeared in any release thus
> > it is easy to do without impacting anyone.
> >
> > I really really do not like to add fields that have limited usage and can be
> > confusing to users. I think RAWF,RAWL fall into this category. It is easy to
> > think or additional fields for many record types that can be useful in special
> > cases. The number of fields will just grow and grow.
> 
> Does this mean that ESLO and EOFF will be made configurable?
> 
> Ben


I will add promptgroup(GUI_CONVERT) to both.
Question. What should special be?
It is currently defined as special(SPC_NOMOD). The question becomes. Should this
field be dynamically configurable. If we remove special(SPC_NOMOD) should we
define asl(ASL0)?

I will throw out a suggestion. For aiRecord.dbd define ESLO and EOFF as

        field(ESLO,DBF_DOUBLE) {
                prompt("Rawto EGU Slope")
                promptgroup(GUI_CONVERT)
                asl(ASL0)
                interest(2)
                initial("1")
        }
        field(EOFF,DBF_DOUBLE) { 
                prompt("Eng Unit Offset")
                promptgroup(GUI_CONVERT)
                asl(ASL0)
                interest(2)
        }

For aoRecord.dbd define them as

        field(EOFF,DBF_DOUBLE) {
                prompt("Eng Unit Offset")
                promptgroup(GUI_CONVERT)
                asl(ASL0)
                interest(2)
        }
        field(ESLO,DBF_DOUBLE) {
                prompt("EGU to Raw Slope")
                promptgroup(GUI_CONVERT)
                asl(ASL0)
                interest(2)
                initial("1")
        }

Marty


Replies:
Re: RAWF, RAWL Andrew Johnson
References:
RE: RAWF, RAWL Redman, Russell O.
Re: RAWF, RAWL Marty Kraimer
Re: RAWF, RAWL Benjamin Franksen

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: RAWF, RAWL Benjamin Franksen
Next: YAPFAC (yet another proposal for analog conversion) Benjamin Franksen
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  <20012002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: RAWF, RAWL Benjamin Franksen
Next: Re: RAWF, RAWL Andrew Johnson
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  <20012002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·