Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Benjamin Franksen <[email protected]> · Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:09:23 +0200

Marty Kraimer wrote:
> 
> "Redman, Russell O." wrote:
> 
> > Marty, is it worth the bother to back out of the changes you made to add
> > RAWL and RAWF?  Or are there enough special cases, and sufficient utility in
> > simulation records to justify retaining RAWL and RAWF?
> 
> I would rather back out the changes. They have not appeared in any release thus
> it is easy to do without impacting anyone.
> 
> I really really do not like to add fields that have limited usage and can be
> confusing to users. I think RAWF,RAWL fall into this category. It is easy to
> think or additional fields for many record types that can be useful in special
> cases. The number of fields will just grow and grow.

Does this mean that ESLO and EOFF will be made configurable?

Ben

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System