Marty,
Would it be possible to create a pseudo-field accessable via record.RTYP
but which is in fact
implemented in record type structures? Specifically, when the channel
access server locates
the record, and discovers it does not have a field of that type, it
could, before returning an error,
check if the field name is one of the allowed pseudo-fields (RTYP, VERS,
etc.).
Chip
- References:
- Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS Marty Kraimer
- Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS and RTYP Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS and RTYP Steve Lewis
- Next:
Re: processing on put to .VAL field Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS and RTYP Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|