Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On Fri, Nov 03 2017, Wang Xiaoqiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is my test on linux-x86_64 arch, using pcaspy 0.7.0 anaconda
> package from https://anaconda.org/paulscherrerinstitute/pcaspy
>
> It does not reproduce the problem. Any chance that you could test using
> the same setup?
Hi, Xiaoqiang. Thanks for confirming for me. I finally figured out
what the issue was. In my test pcaspy IOC, on init I am attempting to
clear the "UDF INVALID" flags with the following:
for k in pvdb:
driver.setParamStatus(k, pcaspy.Severity.NO_ALARM, pcaspy.Severity.NO_ALARM)
In earlier pcaspy versions this was sufficient to clear the flags
without causing any additional odd behavior. I see now that with 0.6
and later the issue I need to additionally call updatePVs() after the
above:
driver.updatePVs()
Is this the right thing to do? Is there a cleaner way to clear the
initial "UDF INVALID" flags? And why is the "UDF INVALID" set
initially anyway?
Thanks so much for the help.
jamie.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Replies:
- Re: issue with either camonitor or pcaspy in 3.15? Wang Xiaoqiang
- References:
- issue with either camonitor or pcaspy in 3.15? Jameson Graef Rollins
- Re: issue with either camonitor or pcaspy in 3.15? Wang Xiaoqiang
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: areaDetector and HDF5 file saving segafaults Mark Rivers
- Next:
Illunis CMV-50 camera & Kaya Custom Fiber framegrabber neil.o'brien
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: issue with either camonitor or pcaspy in 3.15? Wang Xiaoqiang
- Next:
Re: issue with either camonitor or pcaspy in 3.15? Wang Xiaoqiang
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024