Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
> Do you have some specific requirement driving the use of vxWorks/VME, or
> is this a matter of familiarity and experience?
We are familiar with VxWorks, but Linux is also acceptable. At this moment, We do not have any real-time performance requirement yet.
> To me, Linux is a much
> more forgiving environment than RTEMS/vxWorks. I've found non-RT Linux
> to be more than capable of meeting the 10ms cycle deadline of FRIB. PSI
> reported a similar experience with RT Linux at the last week.
If we choose Linux, which Linux distribution would you recommend for running mrfioc2? Which Linux distribution do you and PSI use for running or testing mrfioc2?
Thanks,
Lin
- Replies:
- Re: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Michael Davidsaver
- RE: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Kalantari Babak (PSI)
- References:
- mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 Michael Davidsaver
- Re: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Wang, Lin
- Re: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Michael Davidsaver
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS Sites Shen, Guobao
- Next:
Asyn GPIB proto file exception @writetimeout, @replytimeout James Larsson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Michael Davidsaver
- Next:
Re: mrfioc2 release 2.2.0 (Supports VME-EVM-300 & VME-EVR-300 or not?) Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024