Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <2017 Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <2017
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: Question : What kind of OPI is best?
From: Iain Marcuson <Iain.Marcuson@sydorinstruments.com>
To: Mark Rivers <rivers@cars.uchicago.edu>, PilkyuJung <pilkyu@bmii.co.kr>
Cc: "tech-talk@aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>, "yjkim@kaeri.re.kr" <yjkim@kaeri.re.kr>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:55:29 +0000
I use CSS, but I use the NSLS-II distribution of CSS, which simply requires unzipping a file.

Iain.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tech-talk-bounces@aps.anl.gov [mailto:tech-talk-
> bounces@aps.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Mark Rivers
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 10:22 PM
> To: PilkyuJung <pilkyu@bmii.co.kr>
> Cc: yjkim@kaeri.re.kr; tech-talk@aps.anl.gov
> Subject: RE: Question : What kind of OPI is best?
> 
> Hi Pilkyu Jung,
> 
> Bad point: medm is old, is based on obsolete software (motif), and is no
> longer being actively maintained Good point: medm is very simple to get
> running and has translators for adl files to all other display managers.
> 
> Bad point: CSS is complex, rather difficult to install.
> Good point: CSS is being actively maintained, has many more features than
> medm
> 
> So based on the good and bad points one decides which is best.
> 
> We may switch to caQtDM which is actively maintained, but much less
> complex than CSS.
> 
> Mark
> 
> ________________________________
> From: PilkyuJung [pilkyu@bmii.co.kr]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 6:36 PM
> To: Mark Rivers
> Cc: tech-talk@aps.anl.gov; yjkim@kaeri.re.kr
> Subject: Question : What kind of OPI is best?
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> 
> First of all, your favor was best for solving my problem while I work with
> EPICS. I appreciate you.
> 
> And this time, I am sending you e-mail because of a question.
> 
> These days, I am using CS-Studio as OPI. Also, I have used MEDM. There are
> some different between CSS and MEDM. But people still using MEDM or
> EDM.
> 
> This is my question.
> 
> Is there something benefit for using MEDM or EDM rather than using
> CSS(BOY)?
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Pilkyu Jung
> 
> 



References:
Question : What kind of OPI is best? PilkyuJung
RE: Question : What kind of OPI is best? Mark Rivers

Navigate by Date:
Prev: edm, Fedora 25, and Wayland Pierrick Hanlet
Next: Re: Question : What kind of OPI is best? D Peter Siddons
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <2017
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: Question : What kind of OPI is best? Mark Rivers
Next: Re: Question : What kind of OPI is best? D Peter Siddons
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <2017
ANJ, 14 Feb 2017 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·