Mark, I think this behavior is incorrect, because it does not respect
the value of MDEL and MPST.
2016-05-27 10:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Rivers <[email protected]>:
> It is all really the same thing, which is the behavior of asynPortDriver. It only does callbacks to device support when a value changes. This is the desired behavior most of the time. You can currently easily work around that by setting 2 different values before calling callParamCallbacks. I will add a forceCallbacks() method for the next release of asyn.
>
> You need to keep in mind that even if the driver does the callback to device support, the record may not post a new monitor on the value, depending on the record type and the value of the MDEL field.
>
> Mark
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 27, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> To my understanding,
>> we are talking about 3 different things:
>>
>> a) an asyn record
>> b) a motor Record
>> c) Area Detector
>>
>> I can only talk about b), and there is no update,
>> you still need a workaround in the driver, at least for now.
>>
>> How the area detector is related to the motor update, I don't know.
>> HTH
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 27/05/16 04:49, Henrique Almeida wrote:
>>> I don't think so, I had this problem on Wednesday while writing an areaDetector
>>> IOC that updates a waveform record whenever a new image is saved. If the same
>>> file name is used twice in a row, the second callback does not emit a monitor
>>> event. I'm using EPICS base 3.16 and asyn and areaDetector github master branch.
>>>
>>> Em 26/05/2016 10:08, "Mark Davis" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> On 5/26/2016 1:52 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> I remember that Mark Rivers had said something about changing it so that a
>>> callback would happen for parameters for which the appropriate
>>> setXxxParam() function was called, even if the value had not changed. And
>>> I THINK that it made it in to one of the more recent versions, but if so, I
>>> don't remember which one.
>>>
>>> Mark Davis, FRIB/NSCL
>>>
>>>> To my knowledge,
>>>> there is no update.
>>>> In our driver, we do it like this:
>>>>
>>>> /* If not moving, trigger a record processing at low rate */
>>>> if (!nowMoving) setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_,
>>>> newPositionInSteps + 1);
>>>> setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_, newPositionInSteps);
>>>>
>>>> And I added a test case:
>>>> https://github.com/EuropeanSpallationSource/MCAG_Base_Project/blob/master/epics/test/500_DLY-STOP.py
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Out of curiosity:
>>>> Which kind of device are you using ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/05/16 23:50, Ford, Christopher wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In 2015 there was some discussion on Tech-Talk about how to force a
>>>>> callback for a parameter that had not changed values.
>>>>> Mark Rivers suggested a work-around, as shown below.
>>>>> I wonder if anyone has an update on the situation since then? Has any
>>>>> other method appeared? Or did you have success with the work-around?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Chris Ford, SLAC
>>>>>
>>>>> On16 Nov 2015 Mark Rivers writes:
>>>>>> If a driver wants to force a callback there is a method that does not
>>>>>> require any changes to the base classes, e.g. exposing statusChanged_
>>>>>> as protected or adding a new
>>>>>> isMotorRecordnowFilterButAlwaysProcess_ flag. The driver simply needs
>>>>>> to set a parameter to a different value from present and then back to
>>>>>> its current value, for example
>>>>>> setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position+1.);
>>>>>> setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position);
>>>>>> callParamCallbacks();
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mark Davis
>>> NSCL/FRIB Control Systems Software Engineer
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> a
- References:
- Area Detector question Jörn Wüstenfeld
- RE: Area Detector question ulrik.pedersen
- RE: Area Detector question Mark Rivers
- asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Ford, Christopher
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Torsten Bögershausen
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Mark Davis
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Henrique Almeida
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Torsten Bögershausen
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: archiver appliance vs. data browser junkes
- Next:
RE: archiver appliance vs. data browser michael.kenning
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Ford, Christopher
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|