On 01/14/2016 10:59 AM, Lingyun Yang wrote:
> Thank you all for the help.
>
> Unfortunately this aSub is outputing both "calculation" and "action". So
> I want to forward the "calculations" but inhibit the actions.
> This all/none solutions does not work for me.
As long as your subroutine subsequently returns a non-zero value, you
can control which links get output yourself by calling dbPutLink()
yourself as desired. Take a look in the src/rec/aSubRecord.c file at the
process() routine, where you'll find this code:
> /* Push the output link values */
> if (!status) {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_ARGS; i++)
> dbPutLink(&(&prec->outa)[i], (&prec->ftva)[i], (&prec->vala)[i],
> (&prec->neva)[i]);
> }
You just need to do exactly what the record does for each of the links
that you want to send out. This will probably be *much* easier than
using Kay's calcout suggestion.
- Andrew
--
There are only two hard problems in distributed systems:
2. Exactly-once delivery
1. Guaranteed order of messages
2. Exactly-once delivery
-- Mathias Verraes
- References:
- Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Lingyun Yang
- Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Michael Davidsaver
- Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Andrew Johnson
- Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Lingyun Yang
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Lingyun Yang
- Next:
Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Roehrig, Christian
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Lingyun Yang
- Next:
Re: Skip updating an output link in aSub ? Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|