EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: MVME-5500 Universe II
From: Andy Cousins <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:47:33 +0000
Amit,
I have a document titled "Universe II Manual Addendum" (# 8091142_AD001_05). In section 1.2.7 on page 6 it says:

DTACK* and AS* release
When performing IACK cycles and coupled 8- or 16-bit cycles as a VME master, the Universe II waited for the VME slave to release DTACK* before it removes AS*. If the slave card links release of DTACK* to the release of AS*, a deadlock condition may result because both master and slave wait for each other to end the cycle. The ANSI VME64 Specification specifies no slave relationship between DTACK* and AS*, therefore no assumptions on its behavior should be made by the
slave.
The Universe IIB/IID does not wait for DTACK* to be negated before negating AS*.


The conditions for this behaviour seem to be quite specific in several parameters which could vary between your cases. Could case 3 differ from cases 1 and 2 in being an interrupt cycle, for example?

> Case-1:
> CPU runs under MOTload (native bootloader) and performs A24 cycle.
>
>     CPU asserts AS* and DS* signals.
>     Slave board responds with DTACK*
>     CPU removes AS* and DS*
>     In turn slave also removes DTACK* thereby ending the cycle.
>
> Case-2:
> CPU runs under vxWorks and performs A16 cycle.
>
>     CPU asserts AS* and DS* signals.
>     Slave board responds with DTACK*.
>     CPU then removes AS* and DS*
>     In turn slave also removes DTACK* thereby ending the cycle.
>
> Case-3:
> CPU runs under vxWorks and performs A24 cycle.
>
>     CPU asserts AS* and DS* signals.
>     Slave board responds with DTACK*,
> CPU removes only DS* and not AS*. It expects the slave to remove DTACK*. > Only on finding the DTACK* removed by slave, the master removes AS* ending the cycle.
>
>
> Case-3  (A24, vxWorks) is the most used cycle type.
> It is causing the problem as not every slave follows the sequence expected. > Some slave boards do not use DS* to derive DTACK*. They derive DTACK* using AS* only. > In such cases CPU's AS* and Slave's DTACK* remain asserted causing a deadlock.
>

Regards,
Andy

P.S. I don't know where I got my copy of the addendum from but you can search online for "8091142_AD001_05". IDT bought out Tundra Semiconductor and keep some of the documentation behind a registration wall. Even after I gave their marketing department my details I couldn't find documents describing old versions of the chip on their website, they only document the stuff they're currently selling :-(

P.P.S. This email probably won't thread properly with the originals, apologies.

--
Andy Cousins
[email protected]
01235 778050

--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: Stream Device: infinite loop when remote closes connection Mazanec Tomáš
Next: RE: Stream Device: infinite loop when remote closes connection Mark Rivers
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: MVME-5500 Universe II Michael Davidsaver
Next: Passing a raw byte value from st.cmd to a StreamDevice proto file Michael Ritzert
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 16 Dec 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·