On 11/16/15 8:35 AM, Mark Rivers wrote:
> I think that apart from this communication glitch the unit is working
> well for them.
Hi, Nick.
It's probably too early for us to say, but if we had to say, then yes,
we'd be feeling like it's working well in general. Whatever this glitch
turns out to be, it makes it unworkable right now for what we want
to do. However, we were able to successfully use it for high-speed
beamline tuning type work. Mark's quadEM software is nice, has lots of
capabilities, and has good documentation.
Regards,
Lewis
- References:
- CAENels TetraMM Quad picoammeter nick.rees
- RE: CAENels TetraMM Quad picoammeter Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: CAENels TetraMM Quad picoammeter Mark Rivers
- Next:
menu choice - scalcout? Rob Emery
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: CAENels TetraMM Quad picoammeter Mark Rivers
- Next:
menu choice - scalcout? Rob Emery
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|