EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: PV Update performance
From: "Dalesio, Leo" <[email protected]>
To: 김영욱 <[email protected]>, tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:23:29 +0000

What is the composition of the record types??
Is this just record processing that you are measuring or do you have Channel Access Monitors?
Are the records linked with INP, FLNK firelds or are these reading hardware?
What kind of hardware are you reading?
Are these numbers just the record processing?

What kind of hardware are you reading?
Why 120 Hz - what are you trying to accomplish at that rate?

For just record processing, each section of code only gets executed if it is needed - are you checking alarms? do you have monitors set? 
If you are linking records, it is higher performance to use INP and OUT links with PP set than it is to use an FLNK and then an INP link. 
Until the problem is clear, it is unclear what can be done.
Bob



From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of 김영욱 [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:14 AM
To: tech-talk
Subject: PV Update performance

Hello all,

 

i'm working lately on an EPICS machine, where the number of PVs is 470 at the moment and they need to be updated regularly at 60Hz. The EPICS machine consists of the stuffs as:

 

. VME6100 (Mototorla VME CPU @1.25GHz)

. RTEMS

. EPICS (base-R3-14-12)

 

Currently all these updates for the 470 PVs is taken about 2-3.5 msec; which needs to be improved in a great manner for my 'real' project with about 23,980 PVs, to be updated regularly at 120Hz, after all.

 

Is here anyone who can give me some advice on this 'huge' improvement i need?

 

Best Regards

Young-Wuk KIM


References:
PV Update performance 김영욱

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: PV Update performance michael.abbott
Next: Re: PV Update performance Ralph Lange
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: PV Update performance Ralph Lange
Next: Is someone in Argonne using lvDCOM? Gao, Yuan
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 17 Dec 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·