On 10/23/14 2:58 AM, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 00:07, J. Lewis Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
>>
>> To me, that supports what I said.
>
> Read the following FAQ points as well, there are subtle distinctions
> between whether your main application is GPL or your plugin is GPL,
> and I think the example you pointed to was for a non-GPL plugin to a
> GPL application.
Hi, Andrew.
Hmm...I don't see the subtle distinctions. I see distinctions for
linking and whatnot, but I don't see distinctions for the "fork and
exec" case. I very much so respect your opinion on this, so I'd really
like to understand. There are three FAQ questions that talk about
plug-ins and they all start with a paragraph that says there are no
special requirements if the program uses fork and exec to invoke the
plug-ins. Here are the three questions and the first paragraph of each
answer:
* If I write a plug-in to use with a GPL-covered program, what
requirements does that impose on the licenses I can use for
distributing my plug-in?
It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. If the program
uses fork and exec to invoke plug-ins, then the plug-ins are separate
programs, so the license for the main program makes no requirements
for them.
* Can I apply the GPL when writing a plug-in for a non-free program?
If the program uses fork and exec to invoke plug-ins, then the
plug-ins are separate programs, so the license for the main program
makes no requirements for them. So you can use the GPL for a plug-in,
and there are no special requirements.
* Can I release a non-free program that's designed to load a GPL-covered
plug-in?
It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. For instance, if
the program uses only simple fork and exec to invoke and communicate
with plug-ins, then the plug-ins are separate programs, so the license
of the plug-in makes no requirements about the main program.
So, I'm not getting it. What am I missing?! Thanks for your patience.
Regards,
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Johnson, Andrew N.
- References:
- Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Emmanuel Mayssat
- Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code J. Lewis Muir
- Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Johnson, Andrew N.
- Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code J. Lewis Muir
- Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Johnson, Andrew N.
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: compile on Windows XP with MinGW Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Focus deadlock nick.rees
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Johnson, Andrew N.
- Next:
Re: Discussion about licenses, copyrights, business, and source code Johnson, Andrew N.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|