EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Scaler expected behaviour
From: James Rezende Piton - LNLS <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:13:51 -0300
Dear all,

Is that the expected behaviour with a scaler record?

With camonitor we get:

SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150289
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9883e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150372
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9896e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150437
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9909e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150489
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.99231e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150556
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9936e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150631
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9949e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150686
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9962e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150741
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9975e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150811
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 2.9988e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150883
SAXS1:SCALER01.CNT             2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 Done
SAXS1:SCALER01.S1              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 3e+08
SAXS1:SCALER01.S2              2014-03-28 17:15:59.223015 150945

We have SAXS1:SCALER01.RATE = 60, .TP = 30 and .FREQ = 1e+07. Our
EPICS base is 3.14.11 and scaler record as in std-2-8.

a) the timestamp is frozen. Is that normal?

b) how to ensure I can read the updated counts immediately after .CNT
goes "Done"? Or perhaps one should wait a minimal time before reading
the final count?!

c) are .SS and .US relevant fields to a scaler device support developer?

Thanks!

James
LNLS, Brazil

Replies:
RE: Scaler expected behaviour Mooney, Tim M.

Navigate by Date:
Prev: MJPEG Video Display for CS-Studio Kasemir, Kay
Next: RE: Scaler expected behaviour Mooney, Tim M.
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: MJPEG Video Display for CS-Studio Paul.gibbons
Next: RE: Scaler expected behaviour Mooney, Tim M.
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 17 Dec 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·