Hi Janez,
It works ! It is a clever workaround. Thank you very much.
Gabriele
----- Original Message -----
From: Janez Golob [mailto:[email protected]]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:01:27 +0100
Subject: RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images
Hi,
For the purpose of displaying image you can modify the Color Map property
like this:
Of course the signed 8 bit integers are assumed in my case. And then you set
minimum value to -128 and maximum to 127.
Regards,
Janez
-----Izvirno sporočilo-----
Od: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Namesto Mark Rivers
Poslano: 21. marec 2014 13:01
Za: Hu, Yong; [email protected]; [email protected]
Zadeva: RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images
I should also add that CSS Boy is written in Java, and Java itself does not
have native support for unsigned integer data types. It does have the data
type "char", which is actually an unsigned 16-bit integer in Java.
Interestingly ImageJ treats 16-bit integer images as unsigned, and you have
to play some tricks to get it to display signed 16-bit integers correctly,
and that is also written in Java!
Mark
________________________________________
From: Mark Rivers
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:43 PM
To: Hu, Yong; <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images
The problem is that EPICS CA does not have native unsigned data types. For
efficiency 16-bit image data normally uses a waveform record with
FTVL=SHORT. areaDetector has an ancillary PV that indicates whether the
waveform is epicsInt16 or epicsUInt16. CSS BOY should be using this PV to
determine how to display the data.
Mark
________________________________________
From: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
[[email protected]] on behalf of Hu, Yong [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:36 PM
To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected];
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images
Hi Gabriele,
Before we conclude that the problem is related to BOY, please use "caget
your_image_pv" (or caget -#number your_image_pv) to see what kind of image
data you really get. If you find the data really containing negative values
such as "-1" (I saw this kind of image data when I worked on Prosilica GigE
camera), probably your camera is not properly configured through the
AreaDetector driver.
If you are sure the image data are all OK with the range you expect (i.e.
[0, 65535]), I guess the problem is most likely related to the configuration
of the BOY Intensity Graph. Make sure you configure the following properties
of the BOY Intensity Graph appropriately based on your camera configuration:
Data Height, Data Width, Maximum, Minimum, Color Map, etc.
Give us more info such as your CSS version, image snapshots of the BOY &
ImageJ, result of "caget your_image_pv".
Yong
________________________________________
From: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
[[email protected]] on behalf of Gabriele Salvato
[[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:44 AM
To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images
Hi all,
I use an Intensity Graph widget in a CSS-BOY opi, to show a preview of the
images collected by an Andor camera using AreaDetector.
The images are 16 bit gray level ones (ranging from 0 to 65535).
The widget is connected with a PV (ArrayData) that is the same I use with
the ImageJ plugin distributed with AreaDetector.
The problem is that the widget displays correctly only the pixels with gray
levels < 32767 and interpret grater gray values as negative numbers (16th
bit =1).
On the contrary, ImageJ displays correctly he entire image.
Is there any way to overcome this problem with the BOY widget ?
Thank you,
Gabriele Salvato
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images Janez Golob
- Next:
Re: Cross build/compilation - target only question Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: CSS BOY and 16-bit Images Janez Golob
- Next:
using C# dll's Christian Roehrig
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|