Hi Christophe,
On 02/05/2014 07:49 AM, haquin wrote:
> UFA ... UFU, UFVA ... UFVU fields of the genSub record no longer exist
> in the aSub record,
> I understand that the use of "user defined structures" is not possible
> with aSub record or there is another way to do ?
If you want to use those fields you can still use the genSub record type
instead of the aSub (genSub was never included in Base anyway, you have
always had to build it as an external module). I removed the UF* fields
when I converted the genSub into the aSub because users need to
understand their limitations to use them safely.
- Andrew
--
Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human
intelligence long enough to get money from it. -- Stephen Leacock
- References:
- aSub and "user defined structures" ? haquin
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
aSub and "user defined structures" ? haquin
- Next:
RE: DLS EtherCAT scanner and unmatched datagrams [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] ronaldo.mercado
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
aSub and "user defined structures" ? haquin
- Next:
stdout/stderr buffering on Windows freddie.akeroyd
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|