Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

On Thu Jun 13 2013 08:44:07 GMT+0200 (CEST), Hinko Kočevar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> We were thinking about the same approach, using dfanout to get the
> SCAN value fanned out to the the destination records. Will give a try
> with the dfanout records.
>
> Ralph, we're going to give it a try, haven't worked with the seq rcord
> though  until now.

In this no-frills application, the used seq functionality is very
similar to a dfanout. Main difference in this case: a seq has 10
outputs, compared to 8 for a dfanout.

~Ralph

Replies:

Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Fabian S.

References:

Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar

RE: Changing SCAN field in many records michael.abbott

Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Ralph Lange

Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar

Next: LAN GPIB BOGARD Daniel

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <2013>  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar

Next: Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Fabian S.

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <2013>  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024