EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <20132014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <20132014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices
From: Eric Norum <[email protected]>
To: Rod Nussbaumer <[email protected]>
Cc: epics Techtalk <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:14:10 -0700
We have 55 Caen A36xx supplies connected to a single Linux IOC process and 24 supplies to another.  Communication is over a raw TCP/IP stream using ASYN plus a small custom driver since there are some features of the command set that don't fit well with StreamDevice.  At some point I plan to try UDP/IP to see if that gives better performance.  My concern with TCP/IP is that error/timeout checking and retries happen at a level below where the IOC can easily keep track of what's happening.  

Do you plan to use VXI-11, or a raw TCP/IP stream, or a Telnet (RFC-854, RFC-2217) stream to communicate with the devices?   ASYN has support for all three options.

On May 10, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Rod Nussbaumer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> We are planning for installation of new beamlines requiring approximately 130 magnet power supplies. The proposed supplies (a few different manufacturers and models being considered) may be controlled using VXI-11/Telnet style interfaces, and using SCPI style commands. This implies the use of StreamDevice + Asyn interfaces in EPICS IOCs. My concern is about the scalability of ssyn with the large number of TCP connections to the power supplies. Each power supply will require an asyn IP port to be maintained. Until now, I have only configured asyn-based applications using 2 or 3 ports on a single IOC. This seems like a significant departure from what I consider a conventional system.
> 
> The IOC platform would probably be a VME hosted CPU running Linux, with an ethernet interface dedicated as a kind of VXI-11 fieldbus. It is possible, or likely, that control of the 130 supplies will be spread across 2 or 3 hardware IOC hosts.
> 
> Does anyone have any experience with this kind of configuration? Any problems to anticipate? Any problems that have known solutions? I am planning to try some kind of simulation using multiple physical hosts, possibly using multiple virtual hosts on each. Each host/virtual-host would simulate a power supply. Does this seem like a representative test?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Rod Nussbaumer
> ISAC Controls, TRIUMF
> Vancouver, Canada

-- 
Eric Norum
[email protected]



Replies:
Re: Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices Rod Nussbaumer
References:
Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices Rod Nussbaumer

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices Rod Nussbaumer
Next: Re: EDM Zenon Szalata
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <20132014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices Rod Nussbaumer
Next: Re: Asyn-based TCP/VXI-11 interface to many devices Rod Nussbaumer
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  <20132014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 20 Apr 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·