Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Hi Murali,

Another long standing issue is that monitors won't clear which is a serious problem. We are using version 1.1.5b. I haven't seen any note indicating this has been fixed in any later version.

We only use the JCA/JNI version in our control system.

best regards,
Tom

On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:30 PM, "Shankar, Murali" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Just wanting to check if anyone uses CAJ (pure Java CA client) clients in production especially in combination with IOC's that are using the native CA library.
I've pinged a few folks offline; however, it was thought that a community wide repoll would probably be beneficial.

Known issues that I am already aware of (thanks Michael and Eric)
1) Interoperability issue with the CA Gateway and clients using monitors with DBE_PROPERTY.
2) For CA Access Security, CAJ uses full hostnames (with domain) and libca uses short host names (without domain)
3) The issue with EPICS_CA_MAX_ARRAY_BYTES  has already been fixed.

Has anyone encountered any issues/differences on the IOC side?

Regards,
Murali

Replies:

Re: Using CAJ in production Pelaia II, Tom

References:

Using CAJ in production Shankar, Murali

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Using CSS and setting up RDB Archiver James F Ross

Next: Re: Using CAJ in production Pelaia II, Tom

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <2012>  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: RE: Using CAJ in production nick.rees

Next: Re: Using CAJ in production Pelaia II, Tom

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <2012>  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024