EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <20122013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <20122013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: Using CAJ in production
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:36:08 +0000

Hi Shankar,

 

On Diamond Beamlines our primary EPICS client is GDA, which uses the CAJ pure Java CA client. However, if I understand you correctly, they

 

·         probably don’t monitor PV’s with DBE_PROPERTY through a CA gateway.

·         they don’t use CA Access Security

 

I am not sure about the issue with EPICS_CA_MAX_ARRAY_BYTES, but they do get and monitor large arrays.

 

Cheers,

 

Nick Rees

Principal Software Engineer           Phone: +44 (0)1235-778430

Diamond Light Source                  Fax:   +44 (0)1235-446713

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shankar, Murali
Sent: 29 November 2012 18:30
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Using CAJ in production

 

 

Just wanting to check if anyone uses CAJ (pure Java CA client) clients in production especially in combination with IOC's that are using the native CA library.

I've pinged a few folks offline; however, it was thought that a community wide repoll would probably be beneficial.

 

Known issues that I am already aware of (thanks Michael and Eric)

1) Interoperability issue with the CA Gateway and clients using monitors with DBE_PROPERTY.

2) For CA Access Security, CAJ uses full hostnames (with domain) and libca uses short host names (without domain)

3) The issue with EPICS_CA_MAX_ARRAY_BYTES  has already been fixed.

 

Has anyone encountered any issues/differences on the IOC side?

 

Regards,

Murali

 

 


 

-- 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
 



References:
Using CAJ in production Shankar, Murali

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Using CAJ in production Shankar, Murali
Next: Using CSS and setting up RDB Archiver James F Ross
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <20122013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Using CAJ in production Shankar, Murali
Next: Re: Using CAJ in production Pelaia II, Tom
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  <20122013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 18 Nov 2013 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·