On 07/25/2012 03:59 PM, Mark Rivers wrote:
I think we really want the devAsynXXXArray device support to work as it should standalone, with no additional records needed. I'm hoping the fix I proposed will fix Zen's problem.
I totally agree! Then I can stop using extra records around my waveform
processing :)
Regards,
Hinko
--
Hinko Kocevar
Software development engineer
Instrumentation Technologies d.d.
Velika pot 22, SI-5250 Solkan - Slovenia
T:+386 5 3352600, F:+386 5 3352601
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.i-tech.si
The information transmitted is intended solely for the
addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any review, retention, disclosure or other use
by persons other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please notify the sender and
delete all copies.
- References:
- asynPortDriver Szalata, Zenon M.
- RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- RE: asynPortDriver Szalata, Zenon M.
- RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- RE: asynPortDriver Szalata, Zenon M.
- RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- RE: asynPortDriver Szalata, Zenon M.
- RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- Re: asynPortDriver Hinko Kocevar
- RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: asynPortDriver Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: asynPortDriver Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: asynPortDriver Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|