Hi Andrew,
Will this modification be integrated in the next EPICS release ? when ?
regards.
Le 06/06/2012 18:23, Andrew Johnson a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
On 2012-06-06 Dirk Zimoch wrote:
I had assumed that the primary application for hex numbers would be bit
masks. Signed masks do not make much sense but 0x80000000 does make
sense. Maybe we should test for minus and then either call strtol() or
strtoul().
Agreed, I will do that (currently writing lots of tests...).
- Andrew
begin:vcard
fn:Christophe Haquin
n:Haquin;Christophe
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;work:02 31 45 46 61
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
- Replies:
- RE: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record michael.abbott
- References:
- mask for bitwise operation in CALC record haquin
- Re: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record Eric Norum
- Re: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record Dirk Zimoch
- Re: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
caQtDM - getting not a valid Qt plugin error messages Jimmy Johnson
- Next:
FW: caQtDM Mezger Anton Christian
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: mask for bitwise operation in CALC record michael.abbott
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|