No objection. Make sure to update the wiki page.
Bob
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Andrew Johnson [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values
Hi Ralph,
On 2012-06-01 Ralph Lange wrote:
> What about allowing MASK to be set in the database, and only setting it
> in the init_record() code, if it is 0.
> That would not break existing code (or would it?), and provide an easy
> way to set MASK directly (contiguous or not), avoiding NOBT and SHFT.
That seems like a reasonable proposal for R3.15.0; does anyone want to object
to our doing this?
- Andrew
--
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
- Replies:
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- References:
- RE: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Dalesio, Leo
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Ralph Lange
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|