On 01.06.2012 18:02, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> On 2012-06-01 Dalesio, Leo wrote:
>> The wiki page now clearly states in the introduction to the MBBI and MBBO
>> that the bits must be continuous.
> My point was that the record code doesn't need the bits to be contiguous; it
> will still work properly as long as the result of (RVAL << SHFT) matches one
> of the xxVL field values. I have no intention of letting anyone change the
> code to break that since there are too many device supports and IOCs out there
> which could be relying on this.
What about allowing MASK to be set in the database, and only setting it
in the init_record() code, if it is 0.
That would not break existing code (or would it?), and provide an easy
way to set MASK directly (contiguous or not), avoiding NOBT and SHFT.
~Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Dudley, David
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- References:
- RE: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Dalesio, Leo
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- RE: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Dalesio, Leo
- Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: asynManager isConnected Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Williams Jr., Ernest L.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: mbbi/mbbo Mask values Dudley, David
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|