Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
On 5/30/2012 11:23 AM, Eric Norum wrote:
... Also, I don't think that TSE=-2 is the right choice for this setup
-- the digitizers don't supply the time stamp. I think that you'd be
better off setting the waveform record TSE=<the number of some event
in your timing system event receiver associated with the pulse>.
When using TSE=event# do be aware that there are several potential
races. One is that the data update from your digitizer driver may
arrive and be processed before the updated event timestamp from the EVR.
This should be avoidable in an RTOS if the interrupt and thread
priorities for the two drivers (digitizer and EVR) are picked appropriately.
Michael
- Replies:
- RE: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Allison, Stephanie
- References:
- Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Mark Rivers
- Re: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Re: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Eric Norum
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: calc VAL field not updating from bi VAL field Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
RE: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Eric Norum
- Next:
RE: Proposed change in asyn - request for comments Allison, Stephanie
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 18 Nov 2013 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|