Hello Eduardo,
As I'm sure you already know or have discovered, it is very hard to find components which are certified rad-hardened for the doses we see in the scientific community. I'll ask the obvious question about shielding and distance, but assume you have maximized both for this application.
My suggestion would be to keep it simple - as you indicate the use of potentiometers, it looks like you are going that route. The less electronics on the sensor itself the better. However, be prepared to change the sensors often as the damage becomes too severe for operation. If possible, have your mechanical design team assure that rapid swapping of the sensors is part of the construction - and consider redundancy to allow continued operation after one failure.
That being said, we have had good luck using the Novotechnik linear transducers (http://www.novotechnik.com/products/linear/linear_potentiometric.html). We specified them for use on the LCLS Undulator and haven't had any failures yet to my knowledge. However they do not see neutrons.
In a nutshell, I think it will be hard to find a part certified for your radiation environment. Best to engineer a way to rapidly exchange the piece after a failure.
Hope that helps,
--Josh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Molina Marinas, Eduardo" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:44:25 AM
Subject: Radhard potentiometers?
Hello,
our group is working on a scraper for the IFMIF-EVEDA project. We are looking for an adequate position sensor able to withstand high doses of neutrons, in a linear configuration (no shaft coupled). After searching in the list, it seems that potentiometers could do the job (accuracy and repeatibility should be in the 0.01 mm range) Could anyone suggest a particular manufacturer or product?
Thank you,
Eduardo Molina
CIEMAT
Avda.Complutense 40
ES-28040 Madrid ---------------------------- Confidencialidad: Este mensaje y sus ficheros adjuntos se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente respondiendo al mensaje y proceda a su destrucción. Disclaimer: This message and its attached files is intended exclusively for its recipients and may contain confidential information. If you received this e-mail in error you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. In this case, please notify us by a reply and delete this email and its contents immediately. ----------------------------
- References:
- Radhard potentiometers? Molina Marinas, Eduardo
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Radhard potentiometers? Molina Marinas, Eduardo
- Next:
RE: CA Repeater Problem with new installation of EPICS Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Radhard potentiometers? Molina Marinas, Eduardo
- Next:
RE: Radhard potentiometers? Sarkar, Surajit
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|