On 07/28/11 05:29, Dirk Zimoch wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Like BESSY, we at PSI are using Nagios for everything related to IT
> infrastructure. Mainly because our IT department already uses Nagios and
> everything needed was already in place. Our IT experts always have an
> eye on Nagios but never run the alarm handler or any other EPICS tool.
> In EPICS on the other hand you will see many alarms when the network
> breaks. Another alarm for the network cable will probably not help much.
>
> Dirk
Although one can consider "IT" and the controls systems separate, there
are some interesting intersections possible.
We use nagios3 and munin for much standard network and system monitoring.
However, it is possible (and I am working more on this) to use EPICS to
interface with munin to monitor and control.
Munin-nodes utilize plugins to generate the data, which are easily
accessible using stream device and a simple "fetch <plugin-name>" to get
the numerical data.
but wait, there's more.
Since munin plugins are simply scripts, actions on the munin-node can be
performed, so the plugin can act as an RPC service, accessed via CA.
So, for example, one could easily start and restart services (such as
IOCs) using a munin plugin over CA.
> Martin Pieck wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are in process of installing new single mode fiber optics cable in
>> our LANSCE User Facility and
>> have the
>> opportunity to invest in some network monitoring soft and hardware.
>>
>> So, I was wondering what people are using to monitor their fiber and
>> twisted pair controls network
>> from the switch and
>> router level all the way down to the device level?
>>
>> What are the pros and cons of that system?
>>
>> Any feedback is appreciated!
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Martin
>> \|/
>> (o -)
>> --------------oOO-(_)-OOo-------------------------------------------
>> Martin Pieck | * * * \\
>> MS H820, AOT-IC, | * * /\ * =))
>> Los Alamos National Lab | * /\ * / \ /\ /\ //
>> Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA |/\ / \/\ _/ \/\/ \/ \ *
>> | \/ \ /\/ o \ *
>> (505) 665-0086 office | \/ __o </\_ \ /\
>> (505) 665-5107 fax | /\o_ \< __/\ \_/
>> | ^^^^^^^^^^ (()) (()) /
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
S. Banerian
206-598-0302
UWMC Radiation Oncology
gpg key 6642E7EE
fingerprint = BD13 875D 2D03 5E1D 1E3B 8BF7 F4B8 63AD 6642 E7EE
- References:
- Controls Network Monitoring Tools Martin Pieck
- Re: Controls Network Monitoring Tools Dirk Zimoch
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
sseq record and strings Pierrick Hanlet
- Next:
Re: sseq record and strings Ralph Lange
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Controls Network Monitoring Tools Dirk Zimoch
- Next:
RE: Controls Network Monitoring Tools Zhou, Jingchen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|