On 6/27/11 4:09 PM, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> Yes, that was the idea. However, with the current build rules for TESTPRODUCTs
> I see no way to communicate the distinction from the Makefile to the test
> script. By parsing the last part of the cwd I could find out the T_A, and if we
> adopted the above proposal, I could match it with '64' inside the test
> script...
Hi, Ben.
I'm not understanding. Say you could know that the fat binary
included the i386 and x86_64 target architectures (in the make
file or in the test script). How does that help you? Are you
saying it would help because you'd be able to predict how many
errors you should get?
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot J. Lewis Muir
- Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
RE: Newport XPS and Motor record Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: Sequencer news: latest snapshot Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|