Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

On 4/19/11 1:16 PM, Jay Steele wrote:
>        Does anybody have any ideas or implementations to fix
>        TPMAC so that there isn't this minimum move time of
>        0.25 second? I have not dug into the internal logic yet
>        but thought I would check with the EPICS community
>        first.

Hi, Jay.

The last paragraph of the comment (i.e. "A cleaner fix ...")
includes some suggestions on possible ways to do that.

However, I think at some point you will come up against the rate
at which the PMAC is being polled by the driver.  I think this
is 10 Hz right now.  If you need to get that move time below 0.1
seconds, I think the driver poll rate would need to be increased.

Lewis

Replies:

Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot

References:

question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele

Navigate by Date:

Prev: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele

Next: Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele

Next: Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024