On 4/14/11 10:01 AM, Allison, Stephanie wrote:
> I discovered that even building RTEMS 32 bit sequences (using
> the RTEMS 32bit tool chain) on a linux-x86_64 build is
> problematic as the 64bit-built SNC compiler will, in some
> special cases, convert the .st file to a buggy .c file (in the
> initialization of the state event masks).
I had a similar problem compiling on RHEL 5 (linux-x86_64) for
VxWorks (vxWorks-ppc603, vxWorks-ppc604, and
vxWorks-ppc604_long) using EPICS 3.14.11 (+ Known Problems
patches), SEQ 2.0.12 (as packaged in SynApps 5.5), and the
Tornado 2.0.2 toolchain. I haven't had time to investigate, but
indeed the SNC compiler was generating .c files that the
cross-compiler could not compile. I think the SNC compiler was
generating integer values greater than what could fit in 32 bits
which the cross-compiler choked on.
Lewis
--
J. Lewis Muir
Software Engineer
IMCA-CAT
- Replies:
- Re: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Abadie Lana
- RE: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Abadie Lana
- RE: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Allison, Stephanie
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
Re: ca.py - Throws error - workaround Matt Newville
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
Re: ioc segfault if - c seq flag is not set or +c? Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|