Hi Ralph,
> Or just the minor fix "(honours server-side precision)"?
I vote for this. Thank you!
Stephanie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Lange [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:08 PM
> To: Allison, Stephanie
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Incorrect get_precision
>
> On 23.11.2010 17:28, Allison, Stephanie wrote:
> > BTW - the help for camonitor shows this text:
> >
> > -s: Get value as string (may honour server-side precision)
> >
> > When won't server-side precision be honored/honoured?
>
> The intention was: When the native type is not a float/double or the
> field is not VAL, the precision in the PREC field may not apply.
> But in this case the server forces the precision to 0 or stupidly uses
> the precision for VAL, so it actually gets honoured.
> Hm ... that bracket text should probably be changed.
>
> What about "(server-side conversion)"?
> Or just the minor fix "(honours server-side precision)"?
>
> Thanks for pointing this out!
> Ralph
- References:
- Re: Incorrect get_precision Allison, Stephanie
- Re: Incorrect get_precision Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Incorrect get_precision Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: ca_put_callback once again Ben Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Incorrect get_precision Ralph Lange
- Next:
sncseq compiling error 王锐萍
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·