EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Making a case for cases
From: Alan Biocca <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:31:53 -0700
One thing that is worth considering for new projects is to make a program that builds names. A web based application might be best. So whatever is decided is codified into this one name ratifier.

Record aliases are of great use also where two naming conventions might meet. For example BPMs and other sensors are of several physical types, but from some views they might not have the same variation in naming as they might from a lower level view.

-- Alan

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2010 14:10:52 Purcell, J. David wrote:
>
> There are different interpretations that all allow different "valid" names.
>  But lack of enforcement also allowed names to also be flat out wrong.  And
> now those names are imbedded and we have no real plan on how to fix them.
> In the beginning, if we were told to fix the wrong names, there might have
> been an effort to get to one interpretation of the convention.

Note that since R3.14.11 the IOC supports record aliases, which may provide a
path to fixing wrong names (as long as the right names don't clash with other
wrong names).  You would rename the records to the right names and add aliases
for the wrong names that are in use, which allows you to take as long as you
like to fix all the clients that are still using the wrong names; finally you
delete the aliases when they are no longer needed.  If you do have name
clashes you can probably still do it, but it might take a few cycles.

- Andrew
--
The best FOSS code is written to be read by other humans -- Harald Welte



Replies:
Re: Making a case for cases Ned Arnold
References:
medm Mezger Anton-Chr.
Re: Making a case for cases Steven M. Hartman
Re: Making a case for cases Purcell, J. David
Re: Making a case for cases Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: How do I install to $prefix/EPICS/bin, $prefix/EPICS/lib etc.? Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: Making a case for cases Ralph Lange
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Making a case for cases Ralph Lange
Next: Re: Making a case for cases Ned Arnold
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·