I gots to learn to use "reply all" for these things.
-m
From: Steiner, Mathias
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:02 PM
To: 'Dalesio, Leo'
Subject: RE: Making a case for cases
>>There was one bad part of the SNS naming. As I recall,
the device instance was ambiguous as the cell number and the device instance
were collapsed into 3 digits. So cell 3 pump 12 was the same as cell 31 pump 2.
I don't know if you inherit this - or if you put the device instance separate.
Bob
Yeah, a highly placed source inside SNS, speaking on condition
of anonymity, had told us about that.
Thanks again, Kay!
Our "instance" is either "instance" or
"position along beamline in cm," depending on where in the system we
are. It's a little clunky, but I think it'll serve us well.
In either case, it's separated by "_" from the device
name: cell31pump_002.
Cheers -Mathias