EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12
From: "Mark Rivers" <[email protected]>
To: "Szalata, Zenon M." <[email protected]>, "Eric Norum" <[email protected]>
Cc: TECHTALK Tech-Talk <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:57:08 -0600
I think the error is coming from here in asynRecord.c (or an equivalent call to getOutputEos
 
            status = pasynRecPvt->pasynOctet->getInputEos(
                                    pasynRecPvt->asynOctetPvt,pasynUser,
                                    saveEosBuf,sizeof saveEosBuf,&saveEosLen);
            if (status != asynSuccess) {
                reportError(pasynRec, status, "EOS TOO LONG");
                return;
            }
 
Note that it prints an error about EOS TOO LONG on any error return.  It may be getting some other error from that call.
 
I wonder if this could be a side-effect of removing the readRaw and writeRaw functions from asyn, which was done between R4.9 and R4.10.
 
Can you send your st.cmd script that configures that port?  I suspect you don't have EOS processing enabled, and so getInputEos is returning an (expected) failure because of that (the default implementation in asynOctetBase returns an error).  If so this error should be ignorred in the asynRecord.
 
One workaround should be to enable EOS processing when you create the port, but leave the input and output EOS as the default zero-length strings.
 
Mark

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Szalata, Zenon M.
Sent: Sat 12/5/2009 11:38 PM
To: Eric Norum
Cc: TECHTALK Tech-Talk
Subject: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12



I am not aware of explicitly specifying the EOS string.  I thought that
EOS string was not used and only the EOI was.  That is, the KS3988 GPIB
CAMAC crate controller does not require nor accepts an EOS string.  I
maybe wrong on this.  Perhaps, somehow unwittingly I am sending some EOS
string?  How can I verify that?

Actually, in my original message I told a lie, I am not using
streamdevice, just asyn.

Why does it work with asyn R4.9 and not with the newer versions?  Is it
possible that starting with R4.10 default behavior changed?  Could it
be, that starting with R4.10 I have to explicitly say no EOS?

Zen

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Norum [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 9:01 PM
To: Szalata, Zenon M.
Cc: TECHTALK Tech-Talk
Subject: Re: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12

The E5810A allows only a single EOS character.  Are you trying to use a
longer end-of-string?

On Dec 5, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Szalata, Zenon M. wrote:

> Hi Eric,
> I am using Agilent E5810A.
>
> Here is a line from the st.cmd file:
>
> vxi11Configure( "L0","134.79.64.25",0,0.0,"gpib0",0,0)
>
> Thank you,
> Zen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Norum [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 8:35 PM
> To: Szalata, Zenon M.
> Subject: Re: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12
>
> What GPIB controller are you using?
>
> On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:42 PM, Szalata, Zenon M. wrote:
>
>> I have a simple soft IOC which uses asyn and streamdevice.  It does
IO
>> with KS3988 GPIB CAMAC crate controller.  The IOC works correctly
with
>> asyn R4.9.  I have installed asyn R4.12 and my IOC does not work with
>> asyn R4.12.  I get the following message: "EOS TOO LONG".  I also
> tried
>> asyn R4.11 and R4.10 I see the same message with these the two
> versions
>> of asyn as I see with the latest.
>>
>> How do I overcome this difficulty?  Do these newer versions of asyn
>> require that I make some change to my IOC?  Can someone help me with
>> this, please?
>>
>> For now I am forced to stay with asyn R4.9.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zen
>>
>
> --
> Eric Norum
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>

--
Eric Norum
[email protected]









References:
asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Szalata, Zenon M.
Re: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Eric Norum
RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Szalata, Zenon M.

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Mark Rivers
Next: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Szalata, Zenon M.
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Mark Rivers
Next: RE: asyn R4.10, R4.11, R4.12 Mark Rivers
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 31 Jan 2014 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·