3. I don't know that the maintainers of EPICS fully endorse CAJ. I
think it would be great if they did, but there may be some feeling
that the CA protocol should only be implemented as provided in EPICS
base, and any other language support should be implemented with
bindings into the native CA library rather than a separate
implementing of the CA protocol in that other language.
---- BNL not only endorses this version, we plan to put funding into it to develop it to support the Java IOC. This work is also being supported by the SBIR grant that is funding the Java IOC.
4. Cosylab has developed CAJ. What happens if Cosylab no longer
supports CAJ? Who will maintain it? Similarly, what happens if the
CA protocol is heavily changed, say in EPICS 3.15 - who will do the
work to update CAJ to support the changes to the CA protocol?
----- This is open source. The NSLS II project also expects to have someone delve into this code so that there are at least two authors that understand and can support the code.
Bob
- Replies:
- Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? Matthias Clausen
- References:
- JCA2 vs CAJ? GaryCarr
- Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? J. Lewis Muir
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? J. Lewis Muir
- Next:
Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? Matthias Clausen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? J. Lewis Muir
- Next:
Re: JCA2 vs CAJ? Matthias Clausen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|