EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Comparing catime performance
From: Matt Rippa <[email protected]>
To: EPICS-tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:40:55 -1000
Hi all-

I've setup an mvme2700 with RTEMS and an exampleApp (R3.14.10). I was wondering how my catime results compare with other sites using other boards or OS. Is there an expectation for a 10/100 port?

I've already seen the notes on the mvme-5500 and it looks like my setup isn't quite as good: http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2005/msg00265.php

Perhaps my subnet is busy.


Best regards,
Matt Rippa

--
> catime mrippa:aiExample
Testing with 10000 channels named mrippa:aiExample
channel connect test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00042084 sec,     2376.2 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
Search tries per chan - mean=1.032500 std dev=0.203577 min=1.000000 max=3.000000
channel name=mrippa:aiExample, native type=6, native count=1
        pend event test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00000342 sec,   292758.6 Items per sec
float test
        async put test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00000897 sec,   111438.1 Items per sec, 15.2 Mbps
        async get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00019678 sec,     5081.7 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
        synch get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00022803 sec,     4385.4 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
double test
        async put test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00000898 sec,   111321.7 Items per sec, 15.1 Mbps
        async get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00019742 sec,     5065.3 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
        synch get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00023804 sec,     4201.0 Items per sec, 1.1 Mbps
string test
        async put test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00001010 sec,    99040.4 Items per sec, 16.6 Mbps
        async get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00019695 sec,     5077.3 Items per sec, 1.5 Mbps
        synch get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00022858 sec,     4374.8 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
integer test
        async put test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00000906 sec,   110324.7 Items per sec, 15.0 Mbps
        async get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00022911 sec,     4364.7 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
        synch get test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00022638 sec,     4417.3 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
round trip jitter test
Round trip get delays - mean=0.000228 sec, std dev=0.000008 sec, min=0.000221 sec max=0.000469 sec
free test
Elapsed Per Item =   0.00000056 sec,  1794331.9 Items per sec, 0.0 Mbps


Replies:
Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
Re: Comparing catime performance Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: EPICs base MingW32 compilation failed ! Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Dirk Zimoch
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Yuke Tian
Next: Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 31 Jan 2014 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·