Hi all-
I've setup an mvme2700 with RTEMS and an exampleApp (R3.14.10). I was wondering
how my catime results compare with other sites using other boards or OS. Is
there an expectation for a 10/100 port?
I've already seen the notes on the mvme-5500 and it looks like my setup isn't
quite as good: http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2005/msg00265.php
Perhaps my subnet is busy.
Best regards,
Matt Rippa
--
> catime mrippa:aiExample
Testing with 10000 channels named mrippa:aiExample
channel connect test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00042084 sec, 2376.2 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
Search tries per chan - mean=1.032500 std dev=0.203577 min=1.000000 max=3.000000
channel name=mrippa:aiExample, native type=6, native count=1
pend event test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000342 sec, 292758.6 Items per sec
float test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000897 sec, 111438.1 Items per sec, 15.2 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019678 sec, 5081.7 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022803 sec, 4385.4 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
double test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000898 sec, 111321.7 Items per sec, 15.1 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019742 sec, 5065.3 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00023804 sec, 4201.0 Items per sec, 1.1 Mbps
string test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00001010 sec, 99040.4 Items per sec, 16.6 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019695 sec, 5077.3 Items per sec, 1.5 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022858 sec, 4374.8 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
integer test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000906 sec, 110324.7 Items per sec, 15.0 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022911 sec, 4364.7 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022638 sec, 4417.3 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
round trip jitter test
Round trip get delays - mean=0.000228 sec, std dev=0.000008 sec, min=0.000221
sec max=0.000469 sec
free test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000056 sec, 1794331.9 Items per sec, 0.0 Mbps
- Replies:
- Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
- Re: Comparing catime performance Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICs base MingW32 compilation failed ! Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Dirk Zimoch
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Yuke Tian
- Next:
Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|