g+
g+ Communities
Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Comparing catime performance
From: Matt Rippa <mrippa@gemini.edu>
To: EPICS-tech-talk <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:40:55 -1000
Hi all-

I've setup an mvme2700 with RTEMS and an exampleApp (R3.14.10). I was wondering how my catime results compare with other sites using other boards or OS. Is there an expectation for a 10/100 port?

I've already seen the notes on the mvme-5500 and it looks like my setup isn't quite as good: http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2005/msg00265.php

Perhaps my subnet is busy.


Best regards, Matt Rippa

--
> catime mrippa:aiExample
Testing with 10000 channels named mrippa:aiExample
channel connect test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00042084 sec, 2376.2 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
Search tries per chan - mean=1.032500 std dev=0.203577 min=1.000000 max=3.000000
channel name=mrippa:aiExample, native type=6, native count=1
pend event test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000342 sec, 292758.6 Items per sec
float test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000897 sec, 111438.1 Items per sec, 15.2 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019678 sec, 5081.7 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022803 sec, 4385.4 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
double test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000898 sec, 111321.7 Items per sec, 15.1 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019742 sec, 5065.3 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00023804 sec, 4201.0 Items per sec, 1.1 Mbps
string test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00001010 sec, 99040.4 Items per sec, 16.6 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00019695 sec, 5077.3 Items per sec, 1.5 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022858 sec, 4374.8 Items per sec, 1.3 Mbps
integer test
async put test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000906 sec, 110324.7 Items per sec, 15.0 Mbps
async get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022911 sec, 4364.7 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
synch get test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00022638 sec, 4417.3 Items per sec, 1.2 Mbps
round trip jitter test
Round trip get delays - mean=0.000228 sec, std dev=0.000008 sec, min=0.000221 sec max=0.000469 sec
free test
Elapsed Per Item = 0.00000056 sec, 1794331.9 Items per sec, 0.0 Mbps



Replies:
Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
Re: Comparing catime performance Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: EPICs base MingW32 compilation failed ! Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Dirk Zimoch
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: USB streaming device to linux/epics Yuke Tian
Next: Re: Comparing catime performance Till Straumann
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  <20092010  2011  2012  2013 
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· EPICSv4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·