EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  <20082009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  <20082009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: MVME6100 or 7100
From: "Erik Johansson" <[email protected]>
To: "Matt Rippa" <[email protected]>, "Kate Feng" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:23:48 -1000
Hi Matt,

We are using the MVME6100 with VxWorks 5.5.1 and Tornado 2.2.1 for the
wavefront controller host CPU in our AO systems. We have not had any
problems. The host is the EPICS IOC for the wavefront controller
real-time CPU and also performs some real-time processing to support
telemetry and relaying of real-time tip-tilt data (from the STRAP APD
sensor) to the wavefront controller.

Erik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Rippa
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 9:09 PM
> To: Kate Feng
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: MVME6100 or 7100
> 
> Hi Kate -
> 
> We're in the conceptual designs of rebuilding our secondary 
> mirror control system. The original system was built with DOS 
> over 10 years ago! It's a competent system, but certainly 
> doesn't match our standard controllers at Gemini.
> 
> Part of this design process will be comparing a 
> vxWorks/mvme6100 solution to an RTEMS/mvme6100 solution.
> 
> -Matt
> 
> Kate Feng wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > What is your application for the mvme6100 ?
> > At NSLS, I developed the "disco" BSP for RTEMS 4.8, which 
> was derived 
> > from the RTEMS-mvme5500 BSP to support the "discovery"
> > based boards such as the mvme5500 and mvme6100.  The BSP works fine 
> > except the mvme6100 is not powerful enough to handle the fast data 
> > rate of one of my applications.
> > I got impression from other users that the performance on the 
> > vxWorks/mvme6100 is similar to that on RTEMS/mvme6100.  
> Thus, I needed 
> > to choose a modern and cost-effective solution instead.
> > 
> > Hope this helps.   Kate
> > 
> > Matt Rippa wrote:
> >>> Matt Rippa wrote:
> >>>> Hi All -
> >>>>
> >>>> Are any sites using the MVME6100 on VxWorks 
> 5.5.2/Tornado 2.2.1? If 
> >>>> so, would you recommend these?
> >>>>
> >>>> Has anyone considered the new MVME7100 board? I'm not 
> sure on the 
> >>>> state of the BSP.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Matt
> >>>
> > 
> 
> 


References:
Re: MVME6100 or 7100 Kate Feng
Re: MVME6100 or 7100 Matt Rippa

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: EDM cursors John Sinclair
Next: Re: MVME6100 or 7100 Till Straumann
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  <20082009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: MVME6100 or 7100 Matt Rippa
Next: Re: MVME6100 or 7100 Till Straumann
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  <20082009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·