Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

"Mark Rivers" <[email protected]> · Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:52:15 -0500

Hi Matthew,

I think we should stick with the "at home" meaning.  Many (most?)
controllers don't have the concept of "homed" but they do have the
concept of "at home".

> It is arguably more
> useful to have a 'homed' status, rather than 'at home'. Especially
since
> the 'at home' status can be inferred from the position (once it is
homed
> of course).

I don't think you can infer "at home" from the position.  What if the
motor is a stepper with no encoder and it lost steps sometime after
being homed?  It might not really be at home when the position says it
is.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Pearson, MR (Matthew) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:37 AM
To: Mark Rivers; Ron Sluiter; Joe Sullivan; Tim Mooney; Pete R. Jemian
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Motor home status

Hi,

At Diamond we're currently using several motor controllers, including
the OMS (58 and MAXv), the Delta Tau PMAC (PMAC2-VME, Geobrick) and the
Newport XPS.

The motor record has a field called ATHM, which is set to 1 when the
motor has hit a home switch.

The OMS and Newport drivers use this field correctly, in that ATHM is
set to 1 when the motor is at home position (and is 0 otherwise).
However, the PMAC driver retains the ATHM status when moving away from
the home position - it actually means 'homed' for this driver, rather
than 'at home'.

Most of the motor control at Diamond is performed using the PMAC driver,
so everyone here has become used to this convention. It is arguably more
useful to have a 'homed' status, rather than 'at home'. Especially since
the 'at home' status can be inferred from the position (once it is homed
of course).

Is it the case that every other driver apart from the PMAC driver obeys
the ATHM status? I was considering changing the XPS driver to bring it
in line with the PMAC driver (for the benefit of our beamline users
mainly). However, if every other motor controller driver out there obeys
ATHM, then changing another one to do something different probably isn't
ideal. In this case, we'll probably just leave it as it is.

Any thoughts on this? Or info on other motor controller drivers?

Regards,
Matthew

Dr Matthew Pearson
Software Systems Engineer
Diamond Light Source Ltd
Diamond House
Chilton, Didcot
OX11 0DE
Tel: +44 (0)1235 778538
(58
<DIV><FONT size="1" color="gray">This e-mail and any attachments may
contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for
the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended
addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us
of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain,
distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual
and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any
damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may
be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in
England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell
Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United
Kingdom
</FONT></DIV> 

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System